|
| Key Issues:
|
|

Dam Locations and Status
The Mekong River is under threat. The governments of Cambodia, Laos and
Thailand are planning eleven big hydropower dams on the Mekong River’s
mainstream. If built, the dams would block major fish migrations and
disrupt this vitally important river, placing at risk millions of
people who depend upon the Mekong for their food security and income.

Fisheries, Food Security and Livelihoods
The Mekong River supports one of the world’s most productive inland
fisheries, which feeds over sixty million people. Official estimates
put its value at more than US$3 billion annually. Yet, even this
staggering figure understates the true value, as fisheries are also
central to peoples’ nutrition and food security. Experience around the
world points to the fact there is no way of mitigating such large dams’
impacts on fisheries.

Biodiversity
The undammed Mekong River has an extraordinary aquatic biodiversity,
second only to the Amazon. Building mainstream dams would push the
endangered species such as the Irrawaddy Dolphin, the Mekong Giant
Catfish, and countless other migratory fish species to the brink of
extinction. Losing this ecological wealth would be a tragedy of global
proportions.

Mekong Mainstream Dams in China
China’s dam construction on the Upper Mekong mainstream (Lancang) has already caused serious environmental problems on downstream Burma, northern Thailand and northern Lao PDR. Declining fish stocks and unpredictable water levels made life more difficult for downstream communities, pointing towards the damage that mainstream dams will inflict.

Better Energy Solutions
The bulk of electricity generated by the Mekong mainstream dams is
destined for distant energy-hungry cities in Thailand and Vietnam. Yet
the region’s urban electricity needs could be better met by improving
energy efficiency and deploying recent innovations in decentralized
energy technologies. By adopting policies that encourage investment in
new energy technologies, Mekong governments could leapfrog 1950s-era
big hydro and start growing sustainable, modern economies. Securing
electricity supply in this peaceful way would also avoid cross-border
disputes arising from these dams’ cross-border impacts.

Actions to Date
The prospect of damming the Mekong has evoked widespread concern
amongst potentially affected riverside communities, civil society
groups, academics, journalists, businesses, and the general public
within the Mekong region and internationally. As the Mekong River
sustains both rural and urban populations and is intimately linked to
local cultures and traditions, damming it will undermine the region’s
prospects for sustainable development.

Mekong River Commission and Mekong region donors
The Mekong River Commission (MRC) is an intergovernmental agency
with a history of promoting hydro development along the mainstream that
dates back to the 1950s. Today the agency is supported by the lower
Mekong governments and survives on international donor aid from the
World Bank, Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Japan and Sweden,
amongst others. Despite its mandate to promote sustainable development
of the Mekong River, the MRC has failed to adequately respond to the
threat posed by Mekong mainstream dams.

About Save the Mekong Coalition
The Save the Mekong coalition is open to non-government organizations, community groups, academics, artists and ordinary citizens within the Mekong region and internationally, anyone who shares concerns regarding the future of one of the world’s greatest river systems. It was formed in response to the public’s growing concern about the effects dams on the Mekong River’s mainstream would have on the Mekong’s migratory fish stocks, regional food security, and the livelihoods of millions of people. The Save the Mekong coalition aims to do two things: to raise further public awareness about the risks associated with damming such an important international river, and to persuade policymakers to adopt more sustainable and peaceful ways of meeting people’s energy and water needs.

|
|
|